After all that has been said and done about the last three years of this man's life, Michael Vick showed everyone last night that skill never goes away. He left-handedly destroyed not only the Redskins, but any chance of me going to the playoffs in one of my leagues, (tear for me). For a man who is known for making mistakes, both on and off the field, he has yet to throw an interception since Christmas Eve 2006, when he had probably the worst game in his career. So, if he hadn't decided to harbor a huge dog killing fiasco on his property (note: I refuse to get into an argument about that case), what would his career look like now? Personally, I think he would be right where he is now. In fact, he should probably be wearing a Super Bowl ring trying to break career milestones like, 30,000 passing yds, 200 passing tds, 10,000 rushing yds and 50 rushing tds. And here's my reasonings for this assumption.
If you look at the Falcons now, who Vick would definately still be on, they are 7-2 with all the support Matt Ryan needs to bring them to the Super Bowl, that's right I think they will go to the Super Bowl this year. Now just replace Matt Ryan, and all the QBs the Falcons went through in the 2007 season, with Vick and its still a perfect fit. Michael Turner would provide the run support Vick would need to stop him from trying to run every play, Snelling provides a reliable dump option, White has matured into a great WR, and with Jenkins at #2 and a mediocre TE (because neither Crumpler nor Gonzalez would be on the team) Vick would have all the options he needs downfield. Lastly, the OL deserves a huge amount of credit, since they allow a good QB enough time to pick apart defenses.
So, what do you think? Obviously I made some assumptions since all of this is hypotical anyways, but I'm curious to see if I'm alone in my thought process. Reminder, discuss his career on the field only. This is not a judicial argument.